Sinceno v. Vannoy et al, No. 2:2016cv06895 - Document 24 (E.D. La. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and the instant 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 9/5/2017.(jls)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sinceno v. Vannoy et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WARREN SINCENO CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-6895 DARRYL VANNOY, Warden SECTION "B”(3) ORDER AND REASONS Petitioner Warren Sinceno seeks habeas corpus relief under Title 28 United States Code Section 2254. After the matter was automatically referred to United States Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles under Local Rule 73, he issued a Report and Recommendation to dismiss Petitioner the petition. raised four (Rec. Doc. objections 22 to at 1). that In response, Report and Recommendation. (Rec. Doc. 23 at 1). After reviewing the record, applicable law, and for reasons summarized below, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; 2. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and 3. The instant § 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of September, 2017. ___________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
