Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transports, LLC, No. 2:2015cv02528 - Document 25 (E.D. La. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS re 24 Response/Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e), Plaintiff shall re-file his response in opposition to the motion for partial summary judgment with adequate record citations by Monday, July 25, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 7/20/16.(cg)
Download PDF
Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transports, LLC Doc. 25 U N ITED S TATES D ISTRICT COU RT EASTERN D ISTRICT OF LOU ISIAN A ELW OOD LEE, Pla in tiff CIVIL ACTION VERSU S N O. 15 -2 5 2 8 OFFSH ORE LOGISTICAL AN D TRAN SPORTS L.L.C., D e fe n d an t SECTION : “E” ( 2 ) ORD ER AN D REAS ON S Before the Court is Plaintiff’s response in opposition 1 to Defendants’ m otion for partial sum m ary judgm ent. 2 Plaintiff’s response fails to com ply with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires a party asserting that a fact is genuinely disputed to support the assertion by citing to particular parts of the record. 3 The party m ay satisfy this requirem ent by citing to specific page num bers or paragraphs. In Plaintiff’s m em orandum in support of his m otion, Plaintiff m akes several assertions that lack citations. Plaintiff’s statem ent of contested facts and response to the statem ent of uncontested facts contains no citations to the record. Every assertion should be supported by a specific citation to the record. Accordingly; IT IS ORD ERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e), Plaintiff shall re-file his respon se in opposition to the m otion for partial summ ary judgm ent with adequate record citations by Mo n d ay, Ju ly 2 5 , 2 0 16 , at 5:0 0 p .m . 1 R. Doc. 24. R. Doc. 23. 3 See F ED . R. CIV. P. 56(c)(1). 2 1 Dockets.Justia.com N e w Orle a n s , Lo u is ian a, th is 2 0 th d ay o f Ju ly, 2 0 16 . _______ _____________ __________ SU SIE MORGAN U N ITED S TATES D ISTRICT J U D GE 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.