Jordan v. Ensco Offshore Company, No. 2:2015cv01226 - Document 181 (E.D. La. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS denying as moot Plaintiff's 71 Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Medical Records and 78 Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Personnel Files, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 5/22/2016. (tsf)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jordan v. Ensco Offshore Company Doc. 181 U N ITED S TATES D ISTRICT COU RT EASTERN D ISTRICT OF LOU ISIAN A KEVIN JORD AN , Pla in tiff CIVIL ACTION VERSU S N O. 15 -12 2 6 EN SCO OFFSH ORE COMPAN Y, D e fe n d an t SECTION : “E” ( 1) ORD ER AN D REAS ON S Before the Court are two m otions in lim ine filed by Plaintiff Kevin J ordan: (1) a m otion in lim ine to exclude certain m edical records, 1 and (2) a m otion in lim ine to exclude certain personnel files. 2 Both m otions are opposed. 3 For the reason s that follow, the m otions are D EN IED AS MOOT. The instant m otions in lim ine were filed on May 5, 20 16, and the oppositions were filed approxim ately one week later on May 12th and 13th. On May 16, 20 16, the parties delivered their joint exhibit books to cham bers. The exhibit books included a num ber of objected-to exhibits, am ong them various m edical records and personnel files. In briefing his objections to the m edical records and personnel files, Plaintiff Kevin J ordan referred the Court to his m otions in lim ine. 4 However, because the Defendant had lim ited the scope of the m edical records and personnel files in the exhibit books, the Court was unable to determ ine which portions of the m otions in lim ine still rem ained in dispute. The Court thus ordered the Plaintiff to clarify the portions of the m otions in lim ine that rem ained contested. 5 Plaintiff did so on May 19, 20 16, and the Court has now ruled on all of the 1 R. Doc. 71. R. Doc. 78 . 3 R. Docs. 90 , 115. 4 R. Doc. 131. 5 R. Doc. 141. 2 1 Dockets.Justia.com objected-to m edical records and personnel files. Therefore, Plaintiff’s m otions in lim ine to exclude certain m edical records and personnel files are now m oot. Accordingly; IT IS ORD ERED that Plaintiff Kevin J ordan’s m otions in lim ine to exclude certain m edical records and personnel files are hereby D EN IED AS MOOT. N e w Orle an s , Lo u is ian a, th is 2 3 rd d ay o f May, 2 0 16 . ________________________________ SU SIE MORGAN U N ITED S TATES D ISTRICT JU D GE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
