Jordan v. Ensco Offshore Company, No. 2:2015cv01226 - Document 170 (E.D. La. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS that Plaintiff's Objection to a designation of Randy McGee's deposition is SUSTAINED as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 5/21/16.(cbn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jordan v. Ensco Offshore Company Doc. 170 U N ITED S TATES D ISTRICT COU RT EASTERN D ISTRICT OF LOU ISIAN A KEVIN JORD AN , Pla in tiff CIVIL ACTION VERSU S N O. 15 -12 2 6 EN SCO OFFSH ORE COMPAN Y, D e fe n d an t ORD ER AN D REAS ON S SECTION : “E” ( 1) Before the Court is Plaintiff Kevin J ordan’s objection to a designation of Randy McGee’s deposition. 1 For the following reasons, the objection is SU S TAIN ED . Plaintiff objects to Page 23, line 16, through Page 24, line 15, of Mr. McGee’s deposition. The testim ony concerns Plaintiff’s past m edical treatm ent in relation to this accident and the Defendant’s approval of and paym ent for such treatm ent. The Court finds that the testim ony is irrelevant. At the status conference on May 19, 20 16, Plaintiff’s counsel agreed to waive his m ainten ance-and-cure claim s an d his claim s for attorneys’ fees an d punitive dam ages. Because those claim s have been waived, this excerpt of Mr. McGee’s deposition testim ony is irrelevant, as the Defendant’s approval of and paym ent for Plaintiff’s past m edical treatm ent is no longer an issue in this case. IT IS SO ORD ERED . N e w Orle an s , Lo u is ian a, th is 2 1s t d ay o f May, 2 0 16 . ________________________________ SU SIE MORGAN U N ITED S TATES D ISTRICT J U D GE 1 R. Doc. 124. 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
