Javery v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, No. 2:2014cv02644 - Document 89 (E.D. La. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that 76 Motion in Limine To Exclude Statements Offered by Plaintiff in Support of his Claim for Defamation is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall immediately contact the assigned magistrate judge f or the purpose of scheduling a settlement conference to address the defamation claim, said conference to take place no later than October 31, 2016. No additional motions shall be filed until after the settlement conference concludes. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey. (cml)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Javery v. Lockheed Martin Corporation Doc. 89 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MARK JAVERY CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 14-2644 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION SECTION: "A" (1) ORDER AND REASONS The following motion is before the Court: Motion in Limine To Exclude Statements Offered by Plaintiff in Support of his Claim for Defamation (Rec. Doc. 76) filed by defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. Plaintiff Mark Javery opposes the motion. The motion, submitted on September 21, 2016, is before the Court on the briefs without oral argument. The factual background of this matter is explained in detail in the Court’s April 26, 2016 Order and Reasons granting in part and denying in part Lockheed’s motion for summary judgment. (Rec. Doc. 67). In that ruling the Court explained why Lockheed was entitled to summary judgment on Javery’s claims for racial discrimination. Noting, however, potential problems with Lockheed’s proffered reason for Javery’s termination, and further noting that the accusations that Lockheed made against Javery were defamatory per se, the Court denied Lockheed’s motion for summary judgment on Javery’s defamation claim. That sole remaining claim will proceed to trial before a jury on December 5, 2016. Lockheed has filed an extensive motion in limine that Plaintiff characterizes as a reframed motion for summary judgment on issues that the Court has already decided. This characterization mirrors the Court’s immediate impression of the motion as well. The Court is not revisiting its prior rulings because those rulings were not made lightly. In limine Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com proceedings are not intended as a substitute for a trial on the merits. If Lockheed has included a legitimate evidentiary issue to be determined in limine in its most recent motion then its merit was obfuscated by its dispositive arguments. That said, the Court notes that the parties have not participated in a settlement conference with the magistrate judge since the Court issued its ruling on the motion for summary judgment. Both parties’ efforts would be much better spent in a good faith effort to resolve this matter amicably. Accordingly; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion in Limine To Exclude Statements Offered by Plaintiff in Support of his Claim for Defamation (Rec. Doc. 76) filed by defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall immediately contact the assigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling a settlement conference to address the defamation claim, said conference to take place no later than October 31, 2016. No additional motions shall be filed until after the settlement conference concludes. September 27, 2016 JAY C. ZAINEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
