Williams et al v. Mack et al, No. 2:2013cv06414 - Document 80 (E.D. La. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER and REASONS denying 30 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding Plaintiff Melvin Williams' Loss of Consortium Claim, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/7/2014. (NEF: MAG-5) (cbs)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams et al v. Mack et al Doc. 80 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ROSE WILLIAMS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 13-6414 PERRY MACK, ET AL. SECTION "N" (5) ORDER AND REASONS Presently before the Court is Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment regarding Plaintiff Melvin Williams' Loss of Consortium Claim (Rec. Doc. 30). Having carefully reviewed the parties' opposing and supporting submissions, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED for essentially the reasons stated in Mr. Williams' opposition memorandum (Rec. Doc. 63). This ruling, however, is of course without prejudice to Defendants' right to request judgment in their favor, as a matter of law, at the conclusion of trial, pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At present, the Court simply finds that, on the showing made, Mr. Williams is entitled to present evidence supporting his claims to the trier of fact. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 7th day of November 2014. ________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Clerk to Copy: U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael North Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
