Barthelemy v. River Ventures, LLC et al, No. 2:2011cv02758 - Document 12 (E.D. La. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Leave to File First Supplemental and Amended Complaint," and the parties' joint "Motion to Continue Deadlines" 8 and 9 , are DENIED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 8/21/2012. (cab) Modified on 8/21/2012 to edit document type (cab).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Barthelemy v. River Ventures, LLC et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RENE T. BARTHELEMY, JR. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-2758 RIVER VENTURES, LLC, et al. SECTION “N” (1) ORDER AND REASONS On the showing made, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File First Supplemental and Amended Complaint,” and the parties’ joint “Motion to Continue Deadlines” (Rec. Docs. 8 and 9), are DENIED. Neither submission explains why the proposed additional defendant was not, and could not have been, added prior the expiration of the Court’s March 26, 2012 deadline for amendments (see Rec. Doc. 6). Nor is it clear that circumstances are such that joining an additional defendant, at this juncture, would not prejudice the trial date, the pre-trial conference date, or the dispositive motions deadline in this matter. Finally, the parties’ motion to continue deadlines does not specify to which deadlines the motion applies, or the anticipated length of the requested continuances. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 21st day of August 2012. _________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
