Reels v. Omega Protein, Inc., No. 2:2011cv02593 - Document 47 (E.D. La. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER and REASONS denying 41 Motion in Limine to Exclude the Statement of Alonzo Reels as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 7/30/2012. (cab) Modified on 7/30/2012 to edit document type (cab).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reels v. Omega Protein, Inc. Doc. 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALONZO REELS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-2593 OMEGA PROTEIN, INC. SECTION “N” (1) O R D E R AND REASONS Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude the Statement of Alonzo Reels (Rec. Doc. 41), which Defendant opposes (Rec. Doc. 42). Considering all the parties’ submissions, the Court rules as follows: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff re-urging the motion if the transcript of the statement does not accurately reflect the recording of the statement. Plaintiff’s counsel is instructed to review the tape and the transcript simultaneously to evaluate the accuracy of the transcript. Any objection to the accuracy of the transcript is referred to trial. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 30th day of July, 2012. _________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
