Brown v. Wimberly et al, No. 2:2011cv01169 - Document 50 (E.D. La. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS denying 9 Request/Statement of Oral Argument and 18 Request/Statement of Oral Argument filed by Jesse L Wimberly, III and 32 Request/Statement of Oral Argument filed by Hector R. Lopez. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 11/7/2011. (tsf, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Wimberly et al Doc. 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM E. BROWN CIVIL ACTION Versus NO. 11-1169 JESSE L. WIMBERLY, III, ET AL. SECTION: “F” ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court are requests for oral argument on: (a) Jesse Wimberly’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and special motion to strike, and (b) Hector Lopez’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The requests are DENIED for the following reasons. It is the Court’s policy to grant oral argument on motions if one of the following factors is present: 1. There is a need for an evidentiary hearing. 2. The motion or opposition papers involve a novel or complex issue of law that is unsettled. 3. The motion or opposition papers argue for a change in existing law. 4. The motion or opposition papers implicate a constitutional issue. 5. The case itself is of widespread community interest. Because no motion involves any of the above factors, IT IS ORDERED: that the requests for oral argument on the 1 Dockets.Justia.com defendants’ motions are DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, November 7, 2011. ______________________________ MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
