Gibbens v. Champion Industries, Inc., No. 2:2011cv00868 - Document 97 (E.D. La. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER and REASONS. ORDERED that all exhibits for which paper copies have not been provided in the Bench Book are STRUCK due to the plaintiffs noncompliance with the Courts second 89 Order; Exhs. 67, 81, 85, 88, 89, 101. FURTHER ORDERED that plai ntiff's 87 MOTION to Withdraw Document Exhibits 67, 81, 85, 88, 89, 101 is DISMISSED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition re 86 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Related to Gibbens' New and Un pled Inflammatory Allegations shall be filed by 10/5/2012 at 4:30 p.m. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's 93 MOTION to Amend/Correct and/or Clarify , treated as a memorandum in response to the Court's order, shall be filed into the record. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 10/5/12.(plh, )

Download PDF
Gibbens v. Champion Industries, Inc. Doc. 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SUSAN GIBBENS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11 868 CHAMPION INDUSTRIES, INC. SECTION C (4) ORDER AND REASONS IT IS ORDERED that all exhibits for which paper copies have not been provided in the Bench Book are STRUCK due to the plaintiff’s non compliance with the Court’s second order. Rec. Doc. 89; Exhs. 67, 81, 85, 88, 89, 101. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to withdraw exhibits is DISMISSED as moot. Rec. Doc. 87. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition to defendant’s motion in limine to exclude evidence and testimony related to Gibbens’ new and unpled inflammatory allegations shall be filed by October 5, 2012, at 4:30 p.m. Rec. Doc. 86. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to correct and/or clarify, treated as a memorandum in response to the Court’s order, shall be filed into the record. Rec. Doc. 93. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of October, 2012. ____________________________________ HELEN G. BERRIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.