In re Delta Starr Broadcasting, LLC, No. 2:2010cv04465 - Document 6 (E.D. La. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER & REASONS re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by Vincent Bruno, John Treen: for the reasons stated, appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's order is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/28/2011.(rll, ) Modified on 4/28/2011 to edit doc type (rll, ).

Download PDF
In re Delta Starr Broadcasting, LLC Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DELTA STARR BROADCASTING, L.L.C. CIVIL ACTION Jointly Administered with LA-TERR BROADCASTING CORP. NO: 10-4465 Bankruptcy No: 05-12087 c/w 0610107 and 06-10523 SECTION: R(3) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is the appeal of Vincent Bruno and John Treen of an October 13, 2010 order entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The Bankruptcy Court ordered that the Trustee’s Final Report and Proposed Distribution be approved and that the funds of the estate be distributed in accordance therewith. Bruno and Treen contend that the Bankruptcy Court should not have approved the Trustee’s distribution while their appeal of this Court’s order1 affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling that it had subject matter jurisdiction was pending before the Court of Appeals. The Fifth Circuit has now affirmed the order of this Court that Bruno 1 In re Delta Starr Broadcasting, L.L.C., No. 09-7127 (E.D. La. Feb. 5, 2010). Dockets.Justia.com and Treen were challenging.2 Whether the Bankruptcy Court was correct in approving the Trustee’s distribution while the jurisdictional appeal was pending before the Fifth Circuit is now moot. Therefore, Bruno and Treen’s appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s order is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 28th New Orleans, Louisiana, this ____ day of April, 2011. _____________________________________ SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 In re Delta Starr Broadcasting, L.L.C., No. 10-30195 (5th Cir. Apr. 19, 2011) (per curiam). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.