Moore v. Omega Protein Corporation et al, No. 2:2010cv00311 - Document 50 (E.D. La. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and to Exclude Incorrect Statements of Law Concerning Future Economic Damages 35 is DENIED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/4/2011. (cab) Modified on 1/4/2011 to edit document type (cab).

Download PDF
Moore v. Omega Protein Corporation et al Doc. 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM MOORE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 10-311 OMEGA PROTEIN, INC., et al. SECTION “N” (4) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and to Exclude Incorrect Statements of Law Concerning Future Economic Damages (Rec. Doc. 35). This motion is opposed by Defendants Omega Protein, Inc. and F/V RACCOON POINT (Rec. Doc. 40). After considering the memoranda of the parties and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that, for substantially the same reasons set forth in Defendants’ Opposition and in the case law cited therein, Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and to Exclude Incorrect Statements of Law Concerning Future Economic Damages (Rec. Doc. 35) is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 4th day of January 2011. _______________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.