Hunt v. R & R Marine Holdings, L.L.C., No. 2:2009cv06055 - Document 74 (E.D. La. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER and REASONS denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 8/9/2011. (cab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hunt v. R & R Marine Holdings, L.L.C. Doc. 74 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THOMAS HUNT CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 09-6055 R & R MARINE HOLDINGS, L.L.C., et al. SECTION “N” (4) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 36), which is opposed by Plaintiff. (See Rec. Doc. 45). After considering the memoranda filed by the Parties (including the Reply at Rec. Doc. 50), the evidence and exhibits attached thereto, and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 36) is DENIED. There are genuine issues of materials fact, including but not limited to whether the location of the barges was reasonable for mooring and whether a second deckhand should have been summoned to assist with the mooring task, which preclude summary judgment at this time. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of August 2011. _______________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
