Johnson et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, No. 2:2009cv02496 - Document 77 (E.D. La. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and REASONS denying 39 Motion in Limine to Exclude Proposed Expert Testimony and Report of Plaintiffs' Expert, George Panzeca as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/13/2010. (cab) Modified on 5/13/2010 to edit document type (cab).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Johnson et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Doc. 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JON JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMMODITIES INC. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 09-2496 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, etc. SECTION "N" (4) ORDER AND REASONS Presently before the Court is Defendants’ “Motion in Limine to Exclude Proposed Expert Testimony and Report of Plaintiffs' Expert, George Panzeca” (Rec. Doc. 39). Having considered the parties’ submissions, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. On the showing made, the Court finds that the matters raised by Defendants’ motion arguably impact the weight of the testimony, rather than its admissibility, and can be adequately addressed through vigorous cross-examination. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 13th day of May 2010. ____________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
