Fields v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, No. 2:2009cv02129 - Document 15 (E.D. La. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER and REASONS granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/19/2010. (cab)

Download PDF
Fields v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SILVIO FIELDS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY SECTION 09-2129 “N” (3) ORDER AND REASONS Local Rule 7.5E of the Eastern District of Louisiana requires that a memorandum in opposition to a motion be filed and that a copy be delivered to chambers eight days prior to the date set for hearing of the motion. No memorandum in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 14), set for hearing on May 19, 2010, was filed. Further, it appears to the Court that this motion has merit. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 14) should be and is hereby GRANTED. Thus, Plaintiff’s lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and at Plaintiff’s costs. A motion for reconsideration of this Order, if any, must be filed within ten days of the date this Order is entered by the 1 Dockets.Justia.com Clerk of Court. memorandum to reconsideration The motion must be accompanied by opposition the original would not motion. have been Because necessary a motion had a for timely opposition memorandum been filed, the costs incurred in connection with the motion, including attorneys' fees, will be assessed against the party moving for reconsideration. 16, 83. See FED. R. CIV. P. A statement of costs conforming to Local Rule 54.3 shall be submitted by all parties desiring to be awarded costs and attorneys' fees no later than eight days prior to the hearing of the motion for reconsideration. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 19th day of May 2010. _______________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.