Orlando Company, LLC v. Ystueta, Inc. et al, No. 2:2006cv07919 - Document 37 (E.D. La. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER and REASONS granting 34 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Awards, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 4/10/2013. (cbs) Modified on 4/11/2013 to edit document type (cbs).

Download PDF
Orlando Company, LLC v. Ystueta, Inc. et al Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF ORLANDO COMPANY, LLC CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 06-7919 YSTUETA, INC., ET AL SECTION “N” (5) ORDER AND REASONS Local Rule 7.5 of the Eastern District of Louisiana requires that a memorandum in opposition to a motion be filed eight days prior to the noticed submission date. No memorandum in opposition to the following motion, noticed for submission on April 17, 2013, was filed: “Motion to Confirm Arbitration Awards” (Rec. Doc. 34), filed by plaintiff; Further, the Court finds that the motion has merit. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above motion is hereby GRANTED, and the Court will enter an order forthwith confirming the arbitration award. A motion for reconsideration of this Order, if any, must be filed within twenty-eight days of the date this Order is entered by the Clerk of Court. The motion must be accompanied by opposition memorandum to the original motion. Because a motion for reconsideration would not have been necessary had a timely opposition memorandum been filed, the costs incurred in connection with the motion, including attorneys' fees, will be assessed against the party moving Dockets.Justia.com for reconsideration. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16, 83. A statement of costs conforming to Local Rule 54.3 shall be submitted by all parties desiring to be awarded costs and attorneys’ fees no later than eight days prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 10th day of April, 2013. ______________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.