Feckley v. Claud, No. 5:2015cv00120 - Document 4 (W.D. Ky. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers that because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Courts Order, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (SG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Feckley v. Claud Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH WILLIAM FECKLEY v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-P120-GNS KEN CLAUD DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff William Feckley, an inmate at the Calloway County Jail, initiated this civil action by filing a document on his own paper. By Order entered May 26, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form and either pay the filing fee or submit a prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of fees within 30 days. The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Order within the 30-day period would result in dismissal of the action. More than 30 days have passed, and Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s Order. Courts have an inherent power “acting on their own initiative, to clear their calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking relief.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). Therefore, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (governing involuntary dismissal). Date: July 8, 2015 Greg N. Stivers, Judge United States District Court cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4416.009 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
