Lueuano v. McConnell et al, No. 5:2009cv00102 - Document 7 (W.D. Ky. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/8/09: an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH JAMIE LUEUANO PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09CV-P102-R MITCH MCCONNELL et al. ` DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff filed this action in June 2009. While Plaintiff filed an application to proceed without prepayment of fees, he did not file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement or institutional equivalent. Accordingly, on June 11, 2009, the Clerk of Court sent Plaintiff a notice of deficiency directing him to file a certified copy of his jail/prison trust account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint in this matter. Plaintiff was given 30 days to comply with the deficiency. Plaintiff was warned that his failure to comply within 30 days without good cause shown would result in this matter being brought to the attention of the Court. Plaintiff responded to the notice of deficiency by filing another application to proceed without prepayment of fees (DN 5). No prison trust account statement accompanied the second application nor did Plaintiff provide an adequate explanation for his failure to supply the statement to the Court. At the end the application, Plaintiff simply wrote the following notation, The Mass Family Ring Mob Kingdom Enterprise Inc. of EL Paso Texas . . . Never Ending Saga!!! Following receipt of this second application, the Court instructed Plaintiff that it needed his prison trust account statement or the institutional equivalent to properly adjudicate his pending application to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b). The Court then ordered Plaintiff to file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement or institutional equivalent for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint within 30 days of the entry of the Order or show good cause for his failure to do so. Plaintiff was warned that his failure to comply with the Court s Order would result in dismissal of this action (DN 6). Well over thirty days have passed since the Court s previous Order, and Plaintiff has failed to file a copy of his prison trust account statement or show cause for his failure to do so. Accordingly, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Date: October 8, 2009 cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4413.008 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
