Warren v. Henderson County Dept. Corrections et al, No. 4:2017cv00065 - Document 9 (W.D. Ky. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 10/12/2017: Because it appears that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecution of this case, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants (JBM)

Download PDF
Warren v. Henderson County Dept. Corrections et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-P65-JHM JASON CHRISTOPHER WARREN PLAINTIFF v. HENDERSON COUNTY DEPT. CORRECTIONS et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon filing the instant action, Plaintiff assumed the responsibility of keeping this Court advised of his current address and to actively litigate his claims. See LR 5.2(e) (“All pro se litigants must provide written notice of a change of residential address, and, if different, mailing address, to the Clerk and to the opposing party or the opposing party’s counsel. Failure to notify the Clerk of an address change may result in the dismissal of the litigant’s case or other appropriate sanctions.”). The Court sent a Memorandum Opinion and Order to Plaintiff on August 2, 2017. That mailing was returned to the Court by the U.S. Postal Service marked “Return to Sender; Attempted Not Known; Unable to Forward.” Plaintiff has not advised the Court of his new address, and notices from this Court in this action cannot be served on Plaintiff. In such situations, courts have an inherent power “acting on their own initiative, to clear their calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking relief.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). Because it appears to this Court Dockets.Justia.com that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecution of this case, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order. Date: October 12, 2017 cc: Plaintiff, pro se Defendants 4414.009 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.