Parrott v. Blue, No. 4:2012cv00030 - Document 6 (W.D. Ky. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 4/27/12; The Court will dismiss this case by separate order.cc:Plaintiff (pro se), Defendant, HCA (JBM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT OWENSBORO CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12CV-P30-M JOSEPH SCOTTIE PARROTT PLAINTIFF v. JOE BLUE DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Joseph Scottie Parrott initiated this pro se civil action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 against Defendant Joe Blue, the Hopkins County Jailer. Upon filing the instant action, he assumed the responsibility of keeping this Court advised of his current address and to actively litigate his claims. See LR 5.2(d) ( All pro se litigants must provide written notice of a change of address to the Clerk and to the opposing party or the opposing party s counsel. Failure to notify the Clerk of an address change may result in the dismissal of the litigant s case or other appropriate sanctions. ). The Clerk of Court sent a mailing to Plaintiff on March 13, 2012. That mailing was returned by the United States Postal Service on March 20, 2012, marked Return to Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward. Plaintiff is apparently no longer incarcerated at the Hopkins County Jail, and he has not advised the Court of a change of address. Therefore, neither notices from this Court nor filings by Defendant in this action can be served on Plaintiff. In such situations, courts have an inherent power acting on their own initiative, to clear their calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking relief. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). Because it appears to this Court that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecution of this case, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order. Date: April 27, 2012 cc: Plaintiff, pro se Defendant Hopkins County Attorney 4414.010 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
