Lanham v. Reynolds, No. 3:2017cv00332 - Document 6 (W.D. Ky. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 10/26/2017: The 30-day period has expired without the filing of an amended complaint by Plaintiff. Accordingly, all claims will be dismissed by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendant, HCA (JBM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lanham v. Reynolds Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION BRANDON W. LANHAM, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-P332-DJH LT. REYNOLDS, Defendant. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Brandon W. Lanham, an inmate incarcerated at the Hardin County Detention Center, filed a pro se, in forma pauperis complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered September 6, 2017 (DN 5), the Court conducted an initial review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and granted Plaintiff 30 days within which to file an amended complaint which stated a claim entitling him to relief under § 1983. The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted would result in dismissal of the entire action with prejudice. The 30-day period has expired without the filing of an amended complaint by Plaintiff. Accordingly, all claims will be dismissed by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Date: October 26, 2017 David J. Hale, Judge United States District Court cc: Plaintiff, pro se Defendant Hardin County Attorney 4415.009 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
