Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. HRB Louisville LLC et al, No. 3:2014cv00706 - Document 119 (W.D. Ky. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/13/2016, re 112 Motion to Clarify Consent Judgment. Court GRANTS Royal Apartments an extension of the deadline set forth in LR 54.4 to file a motion for costs and attorney fees within thirty (30) days after final entry of a judgment to all claims and parties in this action. cc: Counsel(RLK)

Download PDF
Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. HRB Louisville LLC et al Doc. 119 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P. PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-cv-00706-CRS HRB LOUISVILLE LLC, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Royal Apartments USA, Inc., doing business as Royal Properties (“Royal Apartments”), filed a motion to clarify the February 4, 2016 consent judgment. The motion is unopposed. The consent judgment dismissed Plaintiff Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P.’s (“Humphreys”) claims against Royal Apartments, but allowed Royal Apartments to move for an award of costs and attorney fees. Royal Apartments now requests this Court clarify a paragraph of the consent judgment that Royal Apartments negotiated. Specifically, Royal Apartments seeks clarify that the consent judgment extends the deadline for filing a motion for costs and attorney fees set forth in Local Rule 54.4. It is not this Court’s duty during this action to interpret a consent judgment some parties recently executed. Instead, the Court will interpret the motion as a request for an extension of time to file a motion for costs and attorney fees. Otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS Royal Apartments an extension of the deadline set forth in Local Rule 54.4 to file a motion for costs and attorney fees within thirty (30) days after final entry of a judgment as to all claims and parties in this action. (DN 112). SO ORDERED. April 13, 2016 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.