Miller et al v. Coty, Inc. et al, No. 3:2014cv00443 - Document 70 (W.D. Ky. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/21/2018: Defendants' Motion in Limine 55 is administratively REMANDED; and the Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine 56 is administratively REMANDED. cc: Counsel (JM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Miller et al v. Coty, Inc. et al Doc. 70 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE MAY MILLER and TIMOTHY MILLER PLAINTIFFS v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-cv-00443-CRS COTY, INC. and COTY US, LLC DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on two motions. The Defendants, Coty, Inc. and Coty US, LLC, move the Court to enter an order In Limine (DN 55). The Plaintiffs, May Miller and Timothy Miller, also move the Court to enter an order In Limine (DN 56). The parties timely filed the motions pursuant to the Amended Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Colin Lindsay (DN 50). However, a trial date not having been scheduled at this time, the Court will administratively remand the motions in limine. The Court will consider the motions of the parties after a trial date has been scheduled. For the reasons stated above, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) the Defendants’ Motion in Limine (DN 55) is administratively REMANDED; and (2) the Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine (DN 56) is administratively REMANDED; IT IS SO ORDERED. March 21, 2018 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
