Morgan v. Commonwealth Computer Recycling et al, No. 3:2012cv00865 - Document 6 (W.D. Ky. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 6/10/13; By separate order, the Court will dismiss this action.cc:Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE HARRISON MORGAN v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-865-M COMMONWEALTH COMPUTER RECYCLING et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION By Order entered April 29, 2013, this Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his lawsuit should not be dismissed for failure to pursue administrative relief with the EEOC within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of his case. More than 30 days have passed, and Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Order. Courts have an inherent power acting on their own initiative, to clear their calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking relief. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). Therefore, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) (governing involuntary dismissal). Date: June 10, 2013 cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4414.009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.