Jackson v. Greyhound Bus Company, No. 3:2011cv00078 - Document 14 (W.D. Ky. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/7/2011. Action was transferred to this Court on 2/8/2011 from the Western District of Missouri. Clerk of this Court mailed Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet showing the new case num ber and assignment. Mailing was returned on 3/21/2011 by the U.S. Postal Service indicating Plaintiff had refused to accept delivery (DN 13). Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an alternate address, nor taken any action in this case since it was transferred to this Court. Court will dismiss the action by separate Order.cc: Plaintiff, pro se (RLK)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jackson v. Greyhound Bus Company Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11CV-78-S JERRI LEIGH JACKSON PLAINTIFF v. GREYHOUND BUS COMPANY DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 9, 2010, acting without the assistance of counsel, Plaintiff Jerri Leigh Jackson filed the above-styled action against Greyhound Bus Company. She commenced the action in United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The action was transferred to this Court on February 8, 2011. On the same day, the Clerk of this Court mailed Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet showing the new case number and assignment. On March 21, 2011, the mailing was returned by the United States Postal Service indicating that Plaintiff had refused to accept delivery (DN 13). Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an alternate address nor taken any action in this case since it was transferred to this Court. It is Plaintiff s responsibility to keep this Court advised of a current address where she can be reached by the Court and by Defendant and to litigate her claims actively. See LR 5.2(d) ( All pro se litigants must provide written notice of a change of address to the Clerk and to the opposing party or the opposing party s counsel. Failure to notify the Clerk of an address change may result in the dismissal of the litigant s case or other appropriate sanctions. ). Plaintiff has Dockets.Justia.com failed in her duties. Additionally, her refusal to accept mail from the Court indicates that she no longer desires to prosecute this action. Therefore, the Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. Date:April 7, 2011 cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4411.008
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
