Borden v. United States of America, No. 1:2020cv00201 - Document 22 (W.D. Ky. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of the following Order transferring case. Signed by District Judge Travis R. McDonough on 12/2/20. (c/m Jason Dean Borden 03460-033 MCCREARY U.S. PENITENTIARY Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 3000 PINE KNOT, KY 42635)(ADA) [Transferred from tned on 12/3/2020.]

Download PDF
Borden v. UnitedCase States1:20-cv-00201-GNS of America Document 22 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 99 Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JASON DEAN BORDEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-499 Judge Travis R. McDonough Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a prisoner of the Federal Bureau of Prisons incarcerated in USP McCreary, has filed a pro se complaint seeking a “special writ” for his federal sentence that a United States District Court in the Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green imposed and/or relief for actions taken in a civil case he filed in the same Court (Doc. 1), a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4), a motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 5), and a motion for change of venue seeking to transfer this action to the Eastern District of Kentucky (Doc. 6). The general venue statute for federal district courts provides in relevant part as follows: A civil action may be brought in— (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00201-GNS Document 22 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 100 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(b)(1)–(3). A federal district court may, “in the interest of justice,” transfer a civil action to any district or division where it could have been filed originally. 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). As set forth above, Plaintiff seeks relief from his sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green and/or for actions taken in a civil case he filed in the same Court. (See Doc. 1.) The Court therefore concludes that the proper venue for this case is the Bowling Green Division of the United States District Court of the Western District of Kentucky and that transfer to that district is in the interest of justice. See O’Neill v. Battisti, 472 F.2d 789, 791 (6th Cir. 1972) (finding that venue in a suit against a public official lies in the district where he performs his official duties). Accordingly, the Clerk will be DIRECTED to transfer this action to the Bowling Green Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky and to close this Court’s file. AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT WILL ENTER. /s/ Travis R. McDonough TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.