Vaughan v. Erwin et al, No. 1:2018cv00017 - Document 262 (W.D. Ky. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 8/29/2022 denying 258 Motion ; denying 259 Motion cc: Counsel; Michael Vaughan, pro se(JWM) Modified to add text on 8/29/2022 (JWM).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vaughan v.Case Erwin1:18-cv-00017-GNS-HBB et al Document 262 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4757 Doc. 262 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-00017-GNS-HBB MICHAEL VAUGHAN PLAINTIFF VS. JAMES ERWIN, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff Michael Vaughan’s “(2nd) MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS: RCC” (DN 258) and “(2nd) MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS: KDOC” (DN 259). These motions are nearly identical to Vaughan’s “MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS: KDOC” (DN 219) and “MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS: RCC” (DN 220) which the Court previously denied (DN 229). For the reasons set forth in the Court’s prior Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Vaughan’s motions (DN 258, DN 259) are DENIED. Copies: Michael Vaughan, pro se Counsel Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
