Donaldson et al v. Brunton et al, No. 1:2013cv00067 - Document 41 (W.D. Ky. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/13/2013 granting 29 Motion to Intervene, except as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and New Hampshire Insurance Company because the claims against them were voluntarily dismissed at Docket No. 40 . cc: Counsel (TJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:13-cv-00067-TBR Plaintiffs JOSEPH D. DONALDSON And KAROL DONALDSON v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Intervening Plaintiff v. SUPERVISED ESTATE OF HERSCHEL OLIVE, JR., BY AND THROUGH ITS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, SANDRA BRUNTON AND JAMES OLIVE, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE CO., FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company s Motion to File an Intervening Complaint. (Docket No. 29.) Plaintiffs, Joseph and Karol Donaldson, have responded stating they have no opposition to the filing of the Intervening Complaint. (Docket No. 32.) Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company has responded stating it has no objection to the filing of the Intervening Complaint. (Docket No. 33.) Defendant New Hampshire Insurance Company has filed a motion opposing the motion to intervene to bring suit against New Hampshire Insurance Company. (Docket No. 34.) This matter is ripe for adjudication. Subsequently, Plaintiff Zurich filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to claims presented in the intervening complaint against Defendants State Farm Mutual 1 Automobile Insurance Company and New Hampshire Insurance Company. (Docket No. 40.) Accordingly, the Court will GRANT Plaintiff Zuirch s Motion to File an Intervening Complaint, except as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and New Hampshire Insurance Company because the claims against them were voluntarily dismissed at Docket No. 40. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: cc: November 13, 2013 Counsel 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.