Stone v. Todd County Detention Center et al, No. 1:2011cv00126 - Document 7 (W.D. Ky. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 12/28/2011; By Order entered on 9/14/2011 the Court directed Plaintiff to file his complaint on a form for a civil rights action, 1983, and directed him to pay the filing fee in full or file com plete application to proceed without prepayment. The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply within 30 days may result in dismissal of the action. A review of the records reveals that the Plaintiff has failed to comply with order or show cause for said failure. By separate order, The Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with an Order of this Court. cc:counsel, Dante Stone, Pro se (PHB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN DANTE CORVETTE STONE PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11CV-P126-R TODD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION By Order entered September 14, 2011, the Court directed Plaintiff to file his complaint on a form for filing a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and directed him to either pay the $350.00 filing fee in full or file a fully completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the sixmonth period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with any portion of the Order within 30 days may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and to comply with an Order of this Court. Well over 30 days have passed, and a review of the record reveals that Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Order or show cause for said failure. Accordingly, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and to comply with an Order of this Court. Date: December 28, 2011 cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4413.005
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
