Gosser v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2009cv00043 - Document 17 (W.D. Ky. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANUM OPINION & ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations; case remanded to Commissioner for new decision. Signed by Senior Judge Edward H. Johnstone on 10/20/2009. cc:counsel (CSD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09CV43-J LEA ANN GOSSER PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Lea Ann Gosser seeks Disability Insurance Benefits which were denied by the Commissioner. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge W. David King who recommends that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for a new decision in which 1) Dr. Reynolds opinion is considered as a lay opinion and not simply a medical opinion, paying particular attention to the implications of Dr. Reynolds assertions on the plaintiff s ability to relate appropriately to supervisors, co-workers, and the general public; 2) Ms. Stark s opinion is given some perceptible weight, paying particular attention to her claim that the depressive phase of the plaintiff s bipolar disorder renders her incapable of sustaining daily activities approximately 14 days in a month; and 3) the Commissioner s credibility rationale satisfies the specificity requirements of SSR 96-7p. The Commissioner has filed objections to which the plaintiff has not responded. The Commissioner s objection to the Magistrate Judge s Report is that the ALJ sufficiently articulated his analysis of Dr. Reynolds and Ms. Starks testimony and reasons for rejecting them. The Commissioner concedes that the ALJ did not specify the weight he gave Ms. Starks testimony or Dr. Reynolds opinion as a lay witness, despite SSR 06-03p s instructions that ALJs generally should explain the weight given to such opinions. Nonetheless, the Commissioner argues that the finding of no disability itself is an implicit rejection of Dr. Reynolds and Ms. Stark s lay testimony. The Court concludes that, pursuant to Lashley v. Secretary, 708 F.2d 1048, 1054 (6th Cir. 1983) and SSR 96-7p, the ALJ should have spelled out his rationale for the weight given to the lay opinion of Ms. Stark and should have similarly analyzed the opinions offered by Dr. Reynolds as lay opinions. This Court has conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge s report in light of the objections thereto and the record as a whole. The Magistrate Judge s Report is hereby adopted, and its findings and conclusions are incorporated by reference herein. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and those findings and conclusions are incorporated by reference herein; 2) The final Decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a new decision in which A) Dr. Reynolds opinion is considered as a lay opinion and not simply a medical opinion, paying particular attention to the implications of Dr. Reynolds assertions on the plaintiff s ability to relate appropriately to supervisors, co-workers, and the general public; B) Ms. Stark s opinion is given some perceptible weight, paying particular attention to her claim that the depressive phase of the plaintiff s bipolar disorder renders her incapable of sustaining daily activities approximately 14 days in a month; and C) the Commissioner s credibility rationale satisfies the specificity requirements of SSR 96-7p. This is a final and appealable Memorandum Opinion and Order, and there is no just cause for delay. October 20, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.