Wells v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al, No. 7:2010cv00099 - Document 40 (E.D. Ky. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. JUDGMENT is entered in f avor of Dft, Bottling Group, LLC, with respect to pla John Wells's claim for wrongful discharge. Wells's remaining negligence claim against dft and his claim against his coworker are REMANDED to the Pike Circuit Court. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 6/8/2011. (TDA)cc: COR & Pike Circuit Court (certified copy w/ attested docket sheet)

Download PDF
Wells v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al Doc. 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE JOHN WELLS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. BOTTLING GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. *** *** Civil Action No. 10-99-ART JUDGMENT *** *** In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Defendant, Bottling Group, LLC, with respect to the plaintiff John Wells’s claim for wrongful discharge. Wells’s remaining negligence claim against the defendant and his claim against his coworker are REMANDED to the Pike Circuit Court. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court’s docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. This the 8th day of June 2011. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.