Pico v. Gilley, No. 6:2021cv00128 - Document 7 (E.D. Ky. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Pico's recent motion at [R. 6] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 8/17/2021.(MM)cc: COR and Alberto Bienvenido Molina Pico by US Mail

Download PDF

Pico v. Gilley Doc. 7 Case: 6:21-cv-00128-GFVT Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/19/21 Page: 1 of 2 - Page ID#: 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON ALBERTO BIENVENIDO MOLINA PICO, Petitioner, v. J. GILLEY, Warden Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 6:21-cv-00128-GFVT MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER *** *** *** *** Alberto Bienvenido Molina Pico is an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Manchester, Kentucky. Proceeding without an attorney, Pico filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [R. 1.] The Court conducted an initial screening of that petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, dismissed it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and entered a corresponding Judgment. [Rs. 4, 5.] That said, Pico has now filed an additional submission into the record titled “motion for habeas corpus” in which he appears to put forth additional arguments in support of his petition. [R. 6]. While the Court has reviewed Pico’s motion, it will deny his request for relief. That is because Pico’s latest filing is simply moot given the Court’s recent Memorandum Opinion and Order, and he has not demonstrated in any clear way that the Court’s earlier decision was erroneous. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Pico’s recent motion at [R. 6] is DENIED. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 6:21-cv-00128-GFVT Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/19/21 Page: 2 of 2 - Page ID#: 38 This 17th day of August, 2021. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.