Jones v. Life Insurance Company of North America, No. 6:2009cv00246 - Document 24 (E.D. Ky. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: the Court hereby ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider [R. 16] be DENIED. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 09/29/2011.(MRS)cc: COR
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON LISA JONES, Plaintiff, V. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 9-246-GFVT ORDER *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff s Motion to Reconsider a previous order of this Court [R. 16], Defendant s Response [R. 20], and Plaintiff s Reply [R. 22]. Plaintiff is essentially rehashing her previously rejected argument for additional discovery. She points to conflicts of interests and argues that their existence should allow her additional discovery [See R. 16]. When a Court is faced with a Motion to Reconsider, [d]istrict courts possess the authority and discretion to reconsider and modify their interlocutory orders at any time before final judgment. Leelanau Wine Cellars, Ltd. v. Black & Red, Inc., 118 Fed. Appx. 942, 945 (6th Cir. 2004). While the Court has the authority to engage in a review of analysis already conducted, the Court finds it unnecessary to do so based on Plaintiff s motion. Plaintiff continues to make arguments based on conflict. The Court already considered and rejected the contention that a conflict justifies additional discovery. As such, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Plaintiff s Motion to Reconsider [R. 16] be DENIED. 1 This the 29th day of September, 2011. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
