Gardner v. Young et al, No. 5:2022cv00020 - Document 8 (E.D. Ky. 2022)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Troy Gardner's complaint [R. 1 ] is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 2/1/22.(JLM)cc: COR and Troy Gardner by US Mail

Download PDF
Gardner v. Young et al Doc. 8 Case: 5:22-cv-00020-KKC Doc #: 8 Filed: 02/01/22 Page: 1 of 1 - Page ID#: 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON TROY GARDNER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 5: 22-20-KKC V. OFFICER YOUNG and OFFICER CRANE, JUDGMENT Defendants. *** *** *** *** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Troy Gardner’s complaint [R. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Entered: February 1, 2022. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.