Hill v. Jones et al, No. 5:2018cv00511 - Document 22 (E.D. Ky. 2019)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 17 is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants; 3. This action is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN FROM ACTIVE DOCKET; 4. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; 5. Scheduled deadlines and proceedings are CONTINUED GENERALLY; 6. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 9/17/2019.(SLH)cc: COR, Plt. (US Mail)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hill v. Jones et al Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON HAROLD HILL, Plaintiff, v. TOM JONES, DOUG THOMAS, and CPT. JOHNSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:18-cv-511-JMH FINAL JUDGMENT *** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, [DE 17], is GRANTED; (2) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants; (3) That this action be, and same hereby is, DISMISSED AND STRICKEN FROM THE ACTIVE DOCKET; (4) That all pending motions be, and the same hereby are, DENIED AS MOOT; (5) That all scheduled deadlines and proceedings be, and the same hereby are, CONTINUED GENERALLY; and (6) That this is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. This the 17th day of September, 2019. Dockets.Justia.com 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
