Young v. Quintana, No. 5:2017cv00248 - Document 3 (E.D. Ky. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:1. Young's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 is DENIED without prejudice. That said, Young may still file a civil rights complaint regarding this matter. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. A corresponding judgment will be entered this date. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 1/10/2018.(STC)cc: Petitioner
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Young v. Quintana Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON TERRY B. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO QUINTANA, Warden, Respondent. *** *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) *** Civil No. 17-248-JMH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER *** Terry B. Young is a prisoner at the Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky. Proceeding without a lawyer, Young filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [R. 1]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Young’s petition without prejudice. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has established a classification system in order to determine where inmates will be confined. See U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Fed. Bureau of Prisons, Program Statement P5100.08: Inmate Sec. Designation & Custody Classification 1 (2006), at https://www.bop.gov/policy/ progstat/5100_008.pdf. As part of that system, the BOP may assign Public Safety Factors (PSFs) to inmates who are not appropriate for placement at an institution which would permit that inmate access to the community (i.e., a minimum security prison). See id. at 13, 48-52 (discussing PSFs). Dockets.Justia.com According to Young, the BOP assigned him a PSF known as “Greatest Severity.” Young asked the BOP to waive that PSF so he could be transferred to a minimum security prison, but the BOP denied his request. Young now argues, among other things, that the BOP denied his request because he is African-American and, therefore, it discriminated against him in violation of the U.S. Constitution and other federal law. Young’s claims, however, are not cognizable under § 2241. That is because “[i]t is well established that challenges to a prisoner’s classification or place of confinement . . . are ‘conditions of confinement’ claims which may only be asserted in a civil rights action.” Owen v. Sepanek, No. 14-cv-158-HRW, 2014 WL 6610169, at *3 (E.D. Ky. 2014) (collecting cases). This includes claims of discrimination in a prisoner’s classification. Id. at *6. Thus, if Young would like to challenge the BOP’s actions regarding his PSF, he must file a formal civil rights complaint with this Court pursuant to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Young’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [R. 1] is DENIED without prejudice. said, Young may still file regarding this matter. 2 a civil rights That complaint 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court’s docket. 3. A corresponding judgment will be entered this date. This 10th day of January, 2018. 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
