Nichols et al v. Cantrell's 1st Stop, Inc. et al, No. 5:2016cv00479 - Document 21 (E.D. Ky. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's 20 Motion seeking substitution of "Cintas Corporation No. 2 for "Cintas Corporation" as defendant is GRANTED, and "Cintas Corporation No. 2" shall be substituted as a defendant; 2. Plaintiff's 20 motion, seeking an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have up to & including 11/10/2017 to respond to Defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/17/2017.(KM)cc: COR

Download PDF
Nichols et al v. Cantrell's 1st Stop, Inc. et al Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION -- LEXINGTON SANDRA K. NICHOLS and DANA D. NICHOLS, CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-479-KKC Plaintiffs, V. OPINION & ORDER CANTRELL’S 1st STOP, INC., et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ combined motion (DE 20) requesting substitution of a party defendant and an extension of time in which to file their response to defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 19). Having been sufficiently advised, and noting that “Cintas Corporation No. 2” has already filed a motion to dismiss in this matter (DE 19), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs’ motion, seeking substitution of “Cintas Corporation No. 2” for “Cintas Corporation” as defendant is GRANTED, and said “Cintas Corporation No. 2” shall be substituted as a defendant; and 2. Plaintiffs’ motion, seeking an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have up to and including FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2017, to respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 19). Dated October 17, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.