Jones v. Winterwood Property Management et al, No. 5:2015cv00051 - Document 79 (E.D. Ky. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: 1) 76 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion. 2) 71 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 3) Claims against Todd Lafferty are DISMISSED w prejudice. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/27/2018. (SCD)cc: COR
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON RONALD L. JONES, JR., Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 5: 15-51-KKC OPINION AND ORDER TODD LAFFERTY, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment (DE 71) filed by the only remaining defendant in this matter: Todd Lafferty. The magistrate judge has filed a report and recommendation (DE 76) recommending that the Court grant the motion and dismiss the plaintiff’s claims against Lafferty with prejudice. Plaintiff has filed objections to the recommendation but none has merit. As explained more thoroughly in the magistrate judge’s recommendation, Lafferty’s motion for summary judgment is supported by facts included his own affidavit. In response, plaintiff has submitted no evidence that would create any dispute as to any material fact. Nor does plaintiff point to any such facts in his objections. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (DE 76) is ADOPTED as the Court’s opinion; 2) defendant Todd Lafferty’s motion for summary judgment (DE 71) is GRANTED; and 3) the claims against Todd Lafferty are DISMISSED with prejudice. Dated March 27, 2018.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
