Stiltner v. Brown, No. 5:2013cv00203 - Document 177 (E.D. Ky. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS: 1. The magistrate judge's 168 Recommended Disposition is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion; 2. The warden's 160 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct 110 Answer to Habeas Petition Motion to Amend/Correct is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 8/3/2018.(KM)cc: COR
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stiltner v. Brown Doc. 177 Eastern District of Kentucky UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON ROY STILTNER, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff FILED AUG 0 3 2018 A.T LEXINGTON ROBERT R. CARR CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT CNIL ACTION NO. 5:13-203 ) ) ) ) ) DeEDRA HART, Warden Defendant OPINION AND ORDER *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on the motion (DE 160) by the defendant, Warden DeEdra Hart, to amend her answer to the plaintiffs petition for habeas corpus relief, which was filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. The magistrate judge has reviewed the motion to amend and recommends that the Court deny it (DE 168). The warden has not filed any objections to that recommendation. Further, the Court has reviewed the recommendation and agrees with its analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS: 1) The magistrate judge's Recommended Disposition (DE 168) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion; and 2) The warden's motion to amend her answer (DE 160) is DENIED. spBy: Karen K. Csk/Wel United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
