Conner v. HH Gregg et al, No. 5:2011cv00047 - Document 13 (E.D. Ky. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ordered that the Court's 8 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 2/9/2011.(SCD)cc: COR
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Conner v. HH Gregg et al Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON PEGGY W. CONNER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. HH GREGG, et al., Defendants. ** ** Civil Action No. 5:11-47-JMH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ** ** ** In response to this Court’s order of February 1, 2011 [DE 8], which required Defendants to show cause why this matter should not be remanded to Madison Circuit Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the Plaintiff and Defendants have filed a Stipulation by Parties as to Amount in Controversy in Response to Show Cause Order [DE 12]. In that Stipulation, the parties “agree and stipulate that the amount in controversy pursuant to Plaintiff’s Complaint exceeds the sum or value of $75,000.” [Id.] In other words, the parties have agreed and stipulated that Plaintiff’s Complaint averred damages greater than the jurisdictional minimum set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1332. From this stipulation, the Court concludes that Defendants have provided this Court with competent proof showing that the amount-in-controversy requirement was satisfied as of the time of removal and that the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over this matter is appropriate. See King v. -1- Dockets.Justia.com Household Finance Corp. II, 593 F.Supp.2d 958, 959 (E.D. Ky. 2009). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s order to show cause, dated February 1, 2011 [DE 8], is DISCHARGED. This the 9th day of February, 2011. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
