DAWSON v. CARTER et al, No. 2:2019cv00222 - Document 60 (S.D. Ind. 2020)

Court Description: ENTRY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS CARTER AND HENDRIX - Because they cannot be held liable as individuals under § 1983 without personal involvement, their motion for summary judgment, dkt. 49 , is GRANTED. No partial fina l judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims brought against defendants Carter and Hendrix. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 39 , remains pending. SEE ORDER. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/17/2020. (KAA)

Download PDF
DAWSON v. CARTER et al Doc. 60 Case 2:19-cv-00222-JPH-MJD Document 60 Filed 12/17/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 527 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION CHARLES DAWSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ROBERT E. CARTER, CHARLES DUGAN, DICK BROWN, JERRY SNYDER, RANDALL PARCEL, JACK HENDRIX, Defendants. No. 2:19-cv-00222-JPH-MJD ENTRY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS CARTER AND HENDRIX Defendants Carter and Hendrix have filed an unopposed motion for summary judgment, dkt. [49], designating evidence that they had no personal involvement with the decision to place Mr. Dawson in administrative segregation or his 30-day reviews, see dkt. 49-1; dkt. 49-3; dkt. 50. “Individual liability under § 1983… requires personal involvement in the alleged constitutional deprivation.” Colbert v. City of Chicago, 851 F.3d 649, 657 (7th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted) (citing Wolf-Lillie v. Sonquist, 699 F.2d 864, 869 (7th Cir. 1983) (“Section 1983 creates a cause of action based on personal liability and predicated upon fault. An individual cannot be held liable in a § 1983 action unless he caused or participated in an alleged constitutional deprivation.... A causal connection, or an affirmative link, between the misconduct complained of and the official sued is necessary.”)). Neither of these defendants were personally involved in the events challenged by the plaintiff in this case. The designated evidence demonstrates that 1) defendant Carter was not personally involved with any of the classification decisions challenged 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-00222-JPH-MJD Document 60 Filed 12/17/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 528 in this case, and 2) neither of these defendants were made aware of the plaintiff's conditions of confinement. See dkt. 49-1, dkt. 49-3. Because they cannot be held liable as individuals under § 1983 without personal involvement, see Colbert, 851 F.3d at 657, their motion for summary judgment, dkt. [49], is GRANTED. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims brought against defendants Carter and Hendrix. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 39, remains pending. SO ORDERED. Date: 12/17/2020 2 Case 2:19-cv-00222-JPH-MJD Document 60 Filed 12/17/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 529 Distribution: CHARLES DAWSON 162406 NEW CASTLE - CF NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 1000 Van Nuys Road NEW CASTLE, IN 47362 David C. Dickmeyer INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL David.Dickmeyer@atg.in.gov Brandon Alan Skates INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL brandon.skates@atg.in.gov 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.