NEAL v. OLIVER, No. 2:2012cv00317 - Document 35 (S.D. Ind. 2013)
Court Description: Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment - The petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment [dkt. 33] is treated as labeled in relation to final judgment issued on July 1, 2013, and as so treated is denied. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/22/2013. (RSF)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
NEAL v. OLIVER Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION ROBERT DAVID NEAL, Petitioner, vs. JOHN C. OLIVER, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-cv-317-JMS-DKL Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment The petitioner’s motion to alter or amend judgment [dkt. 33] is treated as labeled in relation to final judgment issued on July 1, 2013, and as so treated is denied. The reason for this ruling is that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons explained in the Entry of July 1, 2013. Harrington v. City of Chicago, 433 F.3d 542, 546 (7th Cir. 2006) (AAltering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has been a manifest error of law or fact.@)(citing Bordelon v. Chicago Sch. Reform Bd. of Trs., 233 F.3d 524, 529 (7th Cir. 2000)). IT IS SO ORDERED. 07/22/2013 Date: __________________ Distribution: Robert David Neal #15151-180 Terre Haute USP Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808 _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Electronically Registered Counsel Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
