MENDOZA v. PARTNER'S AND HOUSING et al, No. 1:2021cv00409 - Document 8 (S.D. Ind. 2021)

Court Description: ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION ANDDIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - In the Entry of March 5, 2021, the Court screened the Complaint and explained that it is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B) becaus e of deficient pleadings (Filing No. 6 ). The Court gave the Plaintiff an opportunity to amend her Complaint no later than April 7, 2021, and show cause why this case should not be dismissed because of a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plain tiff has failed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the prior Entry (Filing No. 6), this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will be issued under separate order. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/19/2021.(AKH)

Download PDF
MENDOZA v. PARTNER'S AND HOUSING et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CHELLCRISE MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. PARTNER'S AND HOUSING, KASLEY CARROLL, MONICA LAMBERT, and LAVONTA SMITH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:21-cv-00409-TWP-DML ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT In the Entry of March 5, 2021, the Court screened the Complaint and explained that it is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because of deficient pleadings (Filing No. 6). The Court gave the Plaintiff an opportunity to amend her Complaint no later than April 7, 2021, and show cause why this case should not be dismissed because of a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Plaintiff has not responded to the show cause Order and has not filed an amended complaint to cure the jurisdictional deficiencies of her initial Complaint. Thus, Plaintiff has failed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the prior Entry (Filing No. 6), this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Final judgment consistent with this Entry will be issued under separate order. SO ORDERED. Date: 4/19/2021 Dockets.Justia.com Distribution: CHELLCRISE MENDOZA 245 West 38th Street Indianapolis, IN 46208 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.