ALGHADBAWI v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al, No. 1:2010cv01330 - Document 24 (S.D. Ind. 2011)

Court Description: Entry Discussing F.B.I. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - There is no further action the plaintiff seeks of the F.B.I. defendant in this case. The claim against him is moot. The claim which is moot is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and the F.B.I. defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted to that extent. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/26/2011. (JD)

Download PDF
ALGHADBAWI v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA JAMIL ALGHADBAWI, Plaintiff, vs. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-1330-TWP-DKL Entry Discussing F.B.I. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment As used in this Entry, the term “F.B.I. defendant” refers to Robert S. Mueller III, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation. The evidentiary record shows without dispute that all F.B.I. background checks have been conducted and their results forwarded to the appropriate agency. There is no further action the plaintiff seeks of the F.B.I. defendant in this case. The claim against him is moot. Forbes v. Trigg, 976 F.2d 308 (7th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1362 (1993). The claim which is moot is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and the F.B.I. defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted to that extent. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 08/26/2011 Distribution attached. ________________________ Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Dockets.Justia.com Distribution: Gisela A. Westwater U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE gisela.westwater@usdoj.gov Jamil Alghadbawi 3722 Montauk Court Indianapolis, IN 46214

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.