A.M.T. et al v. MURPHY et al, No. 1:2010cv00358 - Document 100 (S.D. Ind. 2011)

Court Description: PERMANENT INJUNCTION and FINAL JUDGMENT -The Court enters Final Judgment in favor of pltfs and the class and against defts to the extent that pltfs sought relief in their Amended Complt. The Court Grants pltfs request for permanent injunction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/10/2011.(CBU)

Download PDF
A.M.T. et al v. MURPHY et al Doc. 100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION A.M.T., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. MICHAEL A. GARGANO, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-0358-JMS-TAB PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT The Court enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs and the class and against Defendants to the extent that Plaintiffs sought relief in their Amended Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10). The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction. Defendants, their agents, and successors are hereby enjoined from denying or limiting coverage for prescribed physical therapy, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and/or speech pathology, for any person enrolled in the Medicaid program under the age of twenty-one where such denial or limitation is based upon 405 I.A.C. 5-22-6(b)(6) and/or (b)(7). Nothing in this injunction should be read to prevent Defendants, their agents, or their successors from denying or limiting prescribed benefits under any other provision of law. 02/10/2011 _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana -1- Dockets.Justia.com Distribution via ECF only: Kenneth J. Falk ACLU OF INDIANA kfalk@aclu-in.org Betsy M. Isenberg INDIANA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Betsy.Isenberg@atg.in.gov Gavin Minor Rose ACLU OF INDIANA grose@aclu-in.org Erica Sue Sullivan INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL erica.sullivan@atg.in.gov -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.