GS CLEANTECH CORPORATION v. CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC, No. 1:2010cv00180 - Document 710 (S.D. Ind. 2020)
Court Description: AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER regarding Order on Bill of Costs 1925 . Signed by Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr on 3/24/2020.Associated Cases: 1:10-ml-02181-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-00180-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08000-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08001-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08002-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08003-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08004-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08005-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08006-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08007-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08008-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08009-RLM-DML, 1:10-cv-08010-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08012-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08013-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08014-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08015-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08016-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08017-RLM-DML, 1:13-cv-08018-RLM-DML, 1:14-cv-08019-RLM-DML, 1:14-cv-08020-RLM-DML(CBU)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GS CLEANTECH CORPORATION v. CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC Doc. 710 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: METHOD OF PROCESSING ETHANOL BYPRODUCTS AND RELATED SUBSYSTEMS (‘858) PATENT LITIGATION RELATED CASES: 1:10-cv-00180-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08000-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08001-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08002-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08003-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08004-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08005-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08006-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08007-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08008-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08009-LJM-DML 1:10-cv-08010-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08012-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08013-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08014-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08015-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08016-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08017-LJM-DML 1:13-cv-08018-LJM-DML 1:14-cv-08019-LJM-DML 1:14-cv-08020-LJM-DML ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:10-ml-2181-RLM-DML AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER The court notes calculation errors as to the amounts awarded to Blue Flint Ethanol, LLC; Heartland Corn Products, LLC; and United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC. Additionally, Cleantech and Pacific Ethanol, Inc. agreed that the parties understated a reduction and asked the court to amend the amount taxed against Cleantech under Pacific Ethanol, Inc.’s bill of cost. Finally, Cleantech asks the court to amend its order as to ICM’s exemplification and copying costs. 1 Dockets.Justia.com ICM’s exhibit attached to the bill of cost identified the copying costs with varying levels of specificity, sometimes specifically listing it with entries such as “Xact Data Discovery- printing discovery responses from Cleantech” and other times with more vague entries such as “Outside Copy Charges- Xact Data Discovery”. The court will tax Cleantech for the exemplification and copying charges which ICM sufficiently identified for the court to determine the content or purpose. Accordingly, the court amends Doc. No. 1925 as follows: Blue Flint Ethanol, LLC Objection Service of summons or subpoena No costs for depo transcripts/ reduced to $3.65 per page for original and $0.90 per page for certified Video depos Printing Heartland Corn Products, LLC Objection Service of summons or subpoena No costs for depo transcripts/ reduced to $3.65 per page for original and $0.90 per page for certified Video depos Printing Response Contested Contested Ruling Reduce by $590 Reduce by $29,539.57 Contested Agreed Total reduction Total Award Reduce by $9,145 Award in full $39,274.57 $12,884.72 Response Contested Contested Ruling Reduce by $60.75 Reduce by $3,217.08 Contested Reduce by $2,573.77 Partially Agreed, Reduce by $1,063.68 partially Contested Total reduction $ 6,915.28 Total Award $ 8,814.77 2 United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC Objection Response Service of summons or subpoena Contest No costs for depo transcripts/ Contest reduced to $3.65 per page for original and $0.90 per page for certified Video depos Contest Printing Pacific Ethanol, Inc. Objection Deposition transcripts Charlie O’Brien E-discovery services Pacer fees Research Fees to the clerk Mediation Phone conference Travel and accommodation Ruling Reduce by $60.75 Reduce by $8,944.29 Reduce by $3,091.27 Partial agree, Reduce by $1,378.43 partial contest Total reduction $13,270.77 Total Award $2,926.62 Response for Contest Agree Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Total reduction Total Award ICM, Inc. Objection Response Service of summons or subpoena Contest Costs incidental to depositions Contest No costs for depo transcripts/ reduced to $3.65 per page for original and $0.90 per page for certified Video depos Witness fees Printing Ruling Award in full Reduce to 42.50 Reduce by $209.90 Reduce by $5,143.90 Reduce by $20 Reduce by $518.64 Reduce by $379.63 Reduce by $872.60 $51,064.67 $986.56 Ruling Reduce by $1,110 Award in full Contest Reduce by $55,242.35 Contest Contest Partial agree, partial contest Total reduction Total Award Reduce by $33,033.50 Reduce by $46.44 Reduce by $62,687.99 3 $151,010.28 $48,658.6 SO ORDERED ENTERED: March 24, 2020 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. Judge, United States District Court Distribution: All Electronically Registered Counsel 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
