SECREST v. ASTRUE, No. 1:2009cv00708 - Document 30 (S.D. Ind. 2010)

Court Description: CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in the Court's Entry Reviewing the Commissioner's Decision, also issued this day and incorporated by reference here, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, VACATES the decision denying Plaintiff benefits, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence four). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/21/2010.(SWM)

Download PDF
SECREST v. ASTRUE Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JACKIE L. SECREST, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-00708-JMS-RLY FINAL JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Entry Reviewing the Commissioner’s Decision, also issued this day and incorporated by reference here, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, VACATES the decision denying Plaintiff benefits, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence four).1 05/21/2010 _______________________________ Jane Magnus-Stinson United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution via CM/ECF only: Thomas E. Kieper UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE tom.kieper@usdoj.gov Joseph W. Shull jshull@pngusa.net 1 Upon the written consent of the parties, this matter has been assigned to the magistrate judge for all proceedings, including for the entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 73. [Dkt. 6.] Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.