MARRS v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., No. 1:2007cv01379 - Document 60 (S.D. Ind. 2009)
Court Description: CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff: The Court, having granted Defendant JPMorgan Chase's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 41], now orders that all of Plaintiff Evert L. Marrs's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/6/2009.(SWM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MARRS v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Doc. 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION EVERT L. MARRS, Plaintiff, vs. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Successor by merger with BANK ONE, N.A., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07-cv-1379-TAB-RLY FINAL JUDGMENT The Court, having granted Defendant JPMorgan Chase’s motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 41], now orders that all of Plaintiff Evert L. Marrs’s claims are dismissed with prejudice. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Dated: 10/06/2009 _______________________________ Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana Dockets.Justia.com Copies to: Timothy Loren Karns PARR RICHEY OBREMSKEY FRANDSEN & PATTERSON LLP-Lebanon tkarns@parrlaw.com Thomas M. McDonald APPLEGATE MCDONALD & ASSOCIATES, P C. amalawoffices@sbcglobal.net Peter L. Obremskey PARR RICHEY OBREMSKEY FRANDSEN & PATTERSON LLP jdouglas@parrlaw.com Matthew R. Strzynski KRIEG DEVAULT LLP mstrzynski@kdlegal.com 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
