GOCKE v. POTTER, No. 1:2007cv00163 - Document 45 (S.D. Ind. 2008)
Court Description: ENTRY Dismissing Action; plaintiff's response 44 to the directions in Part III of this court's 1/16/08 41 , fails to identify a viable basis upon which her complaint may proceed. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant's motion to dismiss 37 is Denied as Moot. Final Judgment shall now be entered (S.E.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/5/08.(MAC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GOCKE v. POTTER Doc. 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SUZANNE KAY GOCKE, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:07-cv-163-SEB-TAB Entry Dismissing Action The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are pending, makes the following rulings: 1. The plaintiff’s response (dkt. 44) to the directions in Part III of this court’s January 16, 2008 Entry (dkt. 41), fails to identify a viable basis upon which her complaint may proceed. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in such Entry, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. The defendant’s motion to dismiss (dkt. 37) is denied as moot. 3. Final judgment consistent with this Entry shall now be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 02/05/2008 _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
