PROSTYAKOV v. MASCO CORPORATION et al, No. 1:2005cv01430 - Document 81 (S.D. Ind. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER REOPENING CASE - pursuant to the Court's Entry Granting Motion to Reopen case and for an Order of Deposit and Investment, this case is reopened for the purpose of entering a satisfaction of judgment. The Clerk of Court shall accept and de posit into the Court's Registry the deposit made by Masco Corporation in the sum of $33,286.59. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that following the aforementioned deposit by Masco, the Clerk shall issue a payment of $33,286.59 to Prostyakov. Masco is ORDERED to submit a proposed Order of Satisfaction of Judgment within five (5) days of its deposit of the $33,286.59 (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/28/08.(MAC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PROSTYAKOV v. MASCO CORPORATION et al Doc. 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PETER A. PROSTYAKOV, Plaintiff, vs. MASCO CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:05-cv-1430-SEB ORDER In accordance with the court’s Entry Granting Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Case to Seek Relief from Judgment Based on Satisfaction of Judgment, Denying Defendant’s Motion for Oral Argument, and Granting Defendant’s Motion for an Order of Deposit and Investment, IT IS ORDERED that this case is reopened for the purpose of entering a satisfaction of judgment; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall accept and deposit into the court’s registry the deposit made by Masco Corporation in this case in the sum of $33,286.59; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall promptly and properly invest said monies in an interest-bearing account and deduct a registry fee as a percentage of the income earned on the investment over the period such sums remain deposited, not to exceed ten percent (10%); IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that following the aforementioned deposit by Masco, the Clerk shall issue a payment of $33,286.59 to Prostyakov. Dockets.Justia.com Following Masco’s deposit in accordance with this order, the court will enter an order finding that the September 29, 2006, judgment against Masco has been satisfied, thus relieving Masco from any further payments under that judgment to Prostyakov. Masco is ORDERED to submit a proposed Order of Satisfaction of Judgment within five (5) days of its deposit of the $33,286.59. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 10/28/2008 _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
